“Raving Reviews”
Fellow Backword Books author RJ Keller and I are both working on writing projects.
It seems this is what we do when we’re “writing.”
“Raving Reviews”
Fellow Backword Books author RJ Keller and I are both working on writing projects.
It seems this is what we do when we’re “writing.”
An exciting debate sparked by a negative book review has been taking place over at the Self-Publishing Review.
In short:
Reviewer doesn’t like book.
Supporters of said book read the review and then leave comments questioning the reviewer’s authority and/or credentials and/or ability to write a review, period. They follow their questions with high praise for the author and his book.
In a subsequent thread of comments (these, too, defending the author and criticizing the reviewer) that follow an interview with one reviewer who liked the book in question and the other reviewer who didn’t, commenter “Christa” quotes part of Alain de Botton’s earlier (and highly publicized) defense of himself, another negatively-reviewed-author, thusly:
“Authors should not always turn the other cheek. . .Authors are totally powerless in the face of reviewers. Someone can go into print and say ‘This person has published the worst book on Earth’ and basically the author can’t do anything about it. . . .There’s an onus on the reviewer to be halfway fair. Essentially, give the reader a sense of what’s going on, try and give its merits and demerits.”
(A link to the full article on de Botton’s response to reviewer Caleb Crain, which quotes him as saying to the NYT reviewer, “I will hate you until I die,” can be found here.)
This was my response to Christa:
Christa quotes Alain de Botton as having written, “Authors should not always turn the other cheek. . .Authors are totally powerless in the face of reviewers. Someone can go into print and say ‘This person has published the worst book on Earth’ and basically the author can’t do anything about it. . . .There’s an onus on the reviewer to be halfway fair. Essentially, give the reader a sense of what’s going on, try and give its merits and demerits.”
Yes. Someone can go into print and say “This person has published the worst book on Earth” and the author can’t do anything about it. The review is out there and people have read it.
I truly, truly understand how upsetting that can be. But, on the other hand, “Authors are totally powerless in the face of reviewers”?
First, and at the risk of sounding mean, that’s just whining. Stop it.
Second, the author isn’t powerless. The work is out there to defend (or destroy) itself.
The author has written the work. The author should know that once it’s out there, it’s open to criticism. Or praise.
As to the onus being on the reviewer to be “fair”…
If a reviewer praises something in an author’s work but does it as a result of a misunderstanding – “The way Mr. Rugshow uses an electrical cord as a metaphor for love is absolutely genius” even though Mr. Rugshow didn’t intend to do that at all, for example – do you think the author, Mr. Rugshow, will write a note saying, “Uhh…actually, your review is stupid because I didn’t mean to use any such metaphor”?
Maybe, but it’s doubtful.
The author has his or her chance to present a case: that’s the work itself.
The reviewer then presents his or her case: that’s the review.
It is what it is. Some will like it, some won’t.
And while some reviewers are probably really, really bad at reviewing (they’ll post a synopsis of the book, essentially, and leave it at that), the last person who should criticize the reviewer is the person being reviewed (or their family and friends).
I’m scared for today’s authors.
Our access to the internet and immediate gratification is dangerous.
Questions:
1. Do you think authors are powerless against reviewers?
2. Should authors (not) always turn the other cheek?
3. Does an author’s arguing with the reviewer help or hurt the author?
Discuss.
(And don’t forget to enter the Backword Books contest – win 7 free paperbacks! Deadline is September 30.)
Author Edward Patterson, whose books are available on Kindle, had the fantastic idea to provide free ebooks to deployed service members.
So far, this many authors have signed up and are donating their books:
Maria E Schneider
Kristen Tsetsi
L.K. Campbell
Elmore Haimes
E.J. Ruek
Leslie Nicholl
Jim Chambers
Kelly Abbell
Chuck Austen (Illustrator)
Willam Woodell (Bluearkasascowboy)
Lloyd Lofthouse
L C. Evans
R. J. Keller
Laura Eno
Moriah Jovan
Andrew Kent
Marva Dasef
Al Past
E. Patrick Dorris
Trish Lamoree
Stanley Morriss
K. Raven Rozier
Sharon Cathcart
Alan Baxter
Susan Helene Gottfried
Brandan Carroll
Lisa Pietsch
Joshua T. Calkins-Treworgy
Eugene Docema
S.A. Rule
&
Edward C. Patterson
ADDITIONALLY: Smashwords has joined in! Read their blog about it here. Clicking the link will provide instructions for publishers, authors, and deployed service members who would like to be involved.
Authors with ebooks, or authors who can make their books available that way, this is an incredible and easy way to offer some troop support. I know my husband would have loved having such endless, and free, reading material during his down time in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Because there promises to be some good conversation at Stacey Cochran’s BookChatter at, say, 9PM EDT.
You can watch the show live over the internet here: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bookchatter
Or, too, you can call in to the show’s line if you just want to listen. The phone # to call in is: (914) 803-4571
But you are of course invited – nay, encouraged! – to call in with questions or comments during the hour.
Also, check out Backword Books’ new video/trailer and tell us what you think. We love it, but we’re biased:
I’m scared for today’s authors.
Our access to the internet and immediate gratification is dangerous.
We should be monitored.
Recently, author Alice Hoffman complained on her twitter page about a bad review. According to an article in Entertainment Weekly, she had these things to say about the reviewer:
“Roberta Silman in the Boston Globe is a moron. How do some people get to review books? And give the plot away.”
“Now any idiot can be a critic. Writers used to review writers. My second novel was reviewed by Ann Tyler. So who is Roberta Silman?”
“No wonder there is no book section in the Globe anymore — they don’t care about their readers, why should we care about them”
(Her twitter page is no longer available.)
Author Alain de Botton, too, is voicing his disagreement with a review of his work:
Caleb [Crain]…In my eyes, and all those who have read [Pleasures and Sorrows of Work] with anything like impartiality, it is a review driven by an almost manic desire to bad-mouth and perversely depreciate anything of value. … You have now killed my book in the United States, nothing short of that. So that’s two years of work down the drain in one miserable 900 word review. … I will hate you till the day I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make. I will be watching with interest and schadenfreude.
I understand the temptation to argue with reviewers. Too well. For instance, someone on Goodreads.com recently said of Homefront, “Think [Lifetime network's] ‘Army Wives,’ but a lot more stark.”
I wanted to choke. “Army Wives“?? I have written countless blog posts and a review for a newspaper criticizing the thinness of the show’s writing, its irresponsible shirking of an opportunity to address a complex and profound experience, and now my book (written before the show aired, by the way) is being compared to that?
So you see. I can certainly empathize with authors who take issue with professional reviewers. Had the Goodreads reviewer been a professional, published, paid reviewer – and not a reader on goodreads – I would have had to handcuff myself to the deck railing (a bottle of wine within reach) to keep myself from responding. Not only did I have a number of arguments to make that address that little, tiny part of the reader’s review, but had the review been one read by a wide audience–a potentially large market–the urge to disagree would have been compounded by the feeling the reviewer’s inaccurate assessment was messing with my livelihood.
(Of course, I’m guessing the power of a review only applies to books published by traditional publishers. Good reviews don’t seem to affect small-press book sales, so it stands to reason a bad review wouldn’t, either. But mainstream authors have a bigger reputation to protect, and every bad review may affect the sales of the books to come later.)
The reason I feel bad for Hoffman (who, you’ll remember, has – since her twitterburst – taken down her page) and Botton is because their public attacks of critics not only erodes the Author aura only a widely distributed author can achieve, but it, in the same way reality TV does to stars, makes it difficult to separate their work from their now-public persona.
I feel bad for Hoffman because, if the removal of her twitter page is any indication, she must be embarrassed. She has to feel exposed. No doubt she felt justified in reacting the way she did when she did it (giving away too much of the plot is truly inexcusable and unprofessional and sloppy), but her page is down now, and typically, pages don’t come down unless someone wants to hide from the internet.
I don’t know if “artists” are any more temperamental than anyone else, but they are certainly subject to more criticism because it’s part of what they do. Which means they’ll be tempted to respond to the criticisms they don’t particularly like or agree with. Not too long ago, that would have meant writing a letter at a desk, putting it in an envelope, and mailing it to the reviewer (or, maybe the Letters to the Editor section). There was time, then, to think. Time between folding the letter and putting it in the envelope. Time while licking the stamp. Time while walking to the mailbox. Time to take it out of the mailbox if it’s one at the end of a driveway.
Now, writing and sending takes place in a matter of minutes–long before the initial anger fades–and can’t be re-thought once it’s out. And taking down your twitter or blog page doesn’t remove the posts someone has already managed to snatch and then publish in a magazine like Entertainment Weekly.
Authors, I beg of you: step away from the computer. Pick up a pen. Light a candle and take out some nice paper. Do it the old fashioned way.
(And then please, please remind me of this. I’m scared for myself, too.)
Here’s what it’s for. (And I’m pulling bits and pieces from the Backword Books site because it’s already been written by Henry Baum, and if it ain’t broke…)
In short, we’re a unique collective that has yet to be done on any large scale, using a medium that is losing stigma and gaining credibility. There has never been a time like this. There’s a perfect storm brewing: publishers less willing to take chances and emerging media making it easier for writers to reach readers…
People read good books. The BACKWORD authors write good books. There are no longer any valid barriers that keep the two groups from finding each other.
Read more about Backword, find out who’s a member, and get something new to read here.


Saturday, I left the house for Davis-Kidd with my bag of books. I planned for a couple hours of sitting at a table with those books and a pen, and watching people walk by. You know – just like I did at Books-a-Million a few weeks ago. (Only, when I went to Books-a-Million, I thought I’d be doing a reading and had spent a good amount of time agonizing over which passages to read. My uncle even got involved, helping me out by marking passages and pages he thought he, as an audience member, would like to listen to.)
When I got to Davis-Kidd, I walked around upstairs, didn’t see a table, went downstairs, and saw a bunch of chairs set up (for a children’s storybook reading, or a later author event, I figured). I went back upstairs and asked where the local authors would be sitting and signing.
The woman at the counter directed me downstairs to another woman, and the other woman told me I and another local author, Shawna M. Harrison (author of My True Soul Exploited, Apprehended, and Broken Within – nonfiction story of Shawna’s experience with so much abuse it hurts to imagine), would be at that table in front of all those chairs.
“Are we supposed to read?” I said.
“Oh, you can do whatever you want. I know Shawna plans to read.”
Oh. Uhhh…
Reading terrifies me. Being in front of people, talking in front of people, is terrifying. I am not unique in this, I know – I’m just saying. In grad school, writers I took a workshop with would read their poems and prose in coffee shops. While they read, I’d sit at a table by the wall with a big cup of coffee. In support. Always in support. I tried to weasel my way out of reading when it was time to present my thesis, but the MFA director wouldn’t have it. “You have to do it,” he said.
It was a disaster.
That was in 2003, and between then and now, I’ve not read a thing to anyone. Until the WKMS interview, when I read a paragraph of Homefront for Mark Welch (and the listening public). But that was different, because there weren’t people sitting in front of me. Looking at me.
And yes, I used to teach classes, but throwing general information at students is not quite the same experience as sitting in front of people – peers, even - with your own writing and reading it to them.
Before it was time to read, Shawna was walking around the store somewhere, and I sat behind the table flipping frantically through Homefront until I found the passages my uncle and I had picked out.
When it came time to read, Shawna and I muttered, “You want to go first?” “No, you can go first,” and before anything was really decided, Shawna announced to the four people in the audience that I would be reading first. (Thaaaanks…)
So, I did. The first passage, I shook a lot and didn’t breathe very much. I had to inhale somewhere toward the end. The second passage, I was a little better, and by the third (and final), I was reading the paragraph I’d practiced for the radio. I had that one down.
Shawna was brilliant. She seemed comfortable reading, comfortable talking, comfortable simply being in front of people. (I haven’t mentioned, yet, how cool she is…I couldn’t have been paired with a better person for my first unexpected, and therefore impromptu, reading.)
After the reading, people started showing up and sitting down and taking part in a discussion about what influenced the books, what our next books were, what advice we had for writers.
Then, when it was time for people to come forward and snatch up all our books, there was an incredible cluster imbalance: Shawna’s side – cluster. My side – empty.
Totally empty.
Luckily, I’d stood alone at tables with my books before, so it wasn’t a big deal. And Bev, who works at Davis-Kidd, was kind enough to walk over and ask me questions so I’d look occupied (thanks, Bev).
In all, it was a great experience. I got to meet Shawna, first of all. She even touched my arm at one point to tell me something, and said, “Oh! There’s muscle there.”
“Yes. Yes there is,” I said.
Second, there’s no better way to get a dreaded reading out of the way than to do it without knowing it’s coming.
And, bonus – I got to go home with this (unframed, however):

(What came to my attention when I saw this sign is that there’s a recurring liberty-taking with my name. Here, they leave out my middle initial. It doesn’t matter (seriously), but it’s interesting, because they left Shawna’s in. The name on my book is written as Kristen J. Tsetsi. So…where’s my J? Also, when fiction writers submitted their stories to American Fiction, some of them would address their letters to “Kris.” When I write reviewers (or when, in the past, I sent letters to agents), they often respond to me with “Kris” even though I sign my name as “Kristen.” [Note, in response to Robin's comment below: funny thing is, I actually prefer Kris! I just find it funny when, in written correspondence, people assume the nickname.] And the Army Wife Network, in their advertisement of my book for their book club, calls me “Karen Tsetsi.” Right next to the cover image of my book, upon which is written “Kristen Tsetsi” It’s just strange!)
P.S. Some copies of Homefront came home with me (the store bought the rest for their shelves). If you’d like a signed copy, click here.